Terms of Service for Debate4Change

Last Updated: 7/3/2026

Welcome to Debate4Change. These Terms of Service ("Terms") govern your use of our website and your participation in our Model United Nations conferences. By registering for, attending, or otherwise participating in Debate4Change, you agree to be bound by these Terms. If you are under the age of majority in your jurisdiction, you must have your parent or legal guardian read and agree to these Terms on your behalf.

SECTION 1: CODE OF CONDUCT AND DECORUM REVISION 0 Model United Nations relies on the professionalism, diplomacy, and respect of all its participants. At Debate4Change, we hold all delegates, faculty advisors, and observers to the highest standards of international diplomacy. Harassment, discrimination, bullying, or any form of inappropriate behavior will not be tolerated and will result in immediate expulsion from the conference without a refund. All delegates must respect the authority of the Secretariat and the Dias staff.

Rules of Procedure for United Nations General Assembly (UNGA): While participating in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for United Nations Security Council (UNSC): While participating in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC): While participating in the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for World Health Organization (WHO): While participating in the World Health Organization (WHO), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the World Health Organization (WHO) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the World Health Organization (WHO) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the World Health Organization (WHO) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Human Rights Council (UNHRC): While participating in the Human Rights Council (UNHRC), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Human Rights Council (UNHRC) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Human Rights Council (UNHRC) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Human Rights Council (UNHRC) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for International Court of Justice (ICJ): While participating in the International Court of Justice (ICJ), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Disarmament and International Security Committee (DISEC): While participating in the Disarmament and International Security Committee (DISEC), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Disarmament and International Security Committee (DISEC) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Disarmament and International Security Committee (DISEC) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Disarmament and International Security Committee (DISEC) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Social, Humanitarian, and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM): While participating in the Social, Humanitarian, and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Social, Humanitarian, and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Social, Humanitarian, and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Social, Humanitarian, and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Special Political and Decolonization Committee (SPECPOL): While participating in the Special Political and Decolonization Committee (SPECPOL), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Special Political and Decolonization Committee (SPECPOL) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Special Political and Decolonization Committee (SPECPOL) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Special Political and Decolonization Committee (SPECPOL) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP): While participating in the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for United Nations Development Programme (UNDP): While participating in the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF): While participating in the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for World Trade Organization (WTO): While participating in the World Trade Organization (WTO), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the World Trade Organization (WTO) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the World Trade Organization (WTO) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the World Trade Organization (WTO) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for International Monetary Fund (IMF): While participating in the International Monetary Fund (IMF), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the International Monetary Fund (IMF) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for World Bank Group (WBG): While participating in the World Bank Group (WBG), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the World Bank Group (WBG) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the World Bank Group (WBG) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the World Bank Group (WBG) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for African Union (AU): While participating in the African Union (AU), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the African Union (AU) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the African Union (AU) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the African Union (AU) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for European Union (EU): While participating in the European Union (EU), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the European Union (EU) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the European Union (EU) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the European Union (EU) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Arab League: While participating in the Arab League, delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Arab League is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Arab League reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Arab League must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN): While participating in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO): While participating in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Organization of American States (OAS): While participating in the Organization of American States (OAS), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Organization of American States (OAS) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Organization of American States (OAS) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Organization of American States (OAS) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Crisis Committee - Historic: While participating in the Crisis Committee - Historic, delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Crisis Committee - Historic is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Crisis Committee - Historic reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Crisis Committee - Historic must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Crisis Committee - Futuristic: While participating in the Crisis Committee - Futuristic, delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Crisis Committee - Futuristic is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Crisis Committee - Futuristic reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Crisis Committee - Futuristic must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Ad-Hoc Committee of the Secretary General: While participating in the Ad-Hoc Committee of the Secretary General, delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Ad-Hoc Committee of the Secretary General is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Ad-Hoc Committee of the Secretary General reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Ad-Hoc Committee of the Secretary General must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Joint Crisis Directive: While participating in the Joint Crisis Directive, delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Joint Crisis Directive is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Joint Crisis Directive reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Joint Crisis Directive must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Continuous Crisis Committee: While participating in the Continuous Crisis Committee, delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Continuous Crisis Committee is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Continuous Crisis Committee reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Continuous Crisis Committee must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Press Corps: While participating in the Press Corps, delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Press Corps is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Press Corps reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Press Corps must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs): While participating in the Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union: To the maximum extent permitted by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA): To the maximum extent permitted by the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA).

Legal Disclaimer regarding the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) of the United States: To the maximum extent permitted by the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) of the United States, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) of the United States, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) of the United States.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP) of India: To the maximum extent permitted by the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP) of India, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP) of India, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP) of India.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) of Canada: To the maximum extent permitted by the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) of Canada, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) of Canada, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) of Canada.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the General Data Protection Law (LGPD) of Brazil: To the maximum extent permitted by the General Data Protection Law (LGPD) of Brazil, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the General Data Protection Law (LGPD) of Brazil, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the General Data Protection Law (LGPD) of Brazil.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) of South Africa: To the maximum extent permitted by the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) of South Africa, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) of South Africa, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) of South Africa.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the Privacy Act 1988 of Australia: To the maximum extent permitted by the Privacy Act 1988 of Australia, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the Privacy Act 1988 of Australia, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the Privacy Act 1988 of Australia.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) of Singapore: To the maximum extent permitted by the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) of Singapore, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) of Singapore, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) of Singapore.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) of Japan: To the maximum extent permitted by the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) of Japan, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) of Japan, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) of Japan.

SECTION 2: CODE OF CONDUCT AND DECORUM REVISION 1 Model United Nations relies on the professionalism, diplomacy, and respect of all its participants. At Debate4Change, we hold all delegates, faculty advisors, and observers to the highest standards of international diplomacy. Harassment, discrimination, bullying, or any form of inappropriate behavior will not be tolerated and will result in immediate expulsion from the conference without a refund. All delegates must respect the authority of the Secretariat and the Dias staff.

Rules of Procedure for United Nations General Assembly (UNGA): While participating in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for United Nations Security Council (UNSC): While participating in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC): While participating in the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for World Health Organization (WHO): While participating in the World Health Organization (WHO), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the World Health Organization (WHO) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the World Health Organization (WHO) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the World Health Organization (WHO) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Human Rights Council (UNHRC): While participating in the Human Rights Council (UNHRC), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Human Rights Council (UNHRC) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Human Rights Council (UNHRC) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Human Rights Council (UNHRC) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for International Court of Justice (ICJ): While participating in the International Court of Justice (ICJ), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Disarmament and International Security Committee (DISEC): While participating in the Disarmament and International Security Committee (DISEC), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Disarmament and International Security Committee (DISEC) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Disarmament and International Security Committee (DISEC) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Disarmament and International Security Committee (DISEC) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Social, Humanitarian, and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM): While participating in the Social, Humanitarian, and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Social, Humanitarian, and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Social, Humanitarian, and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Social, Humanitarian, and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Special Political and Decolonization Committee (SPECPOL): While participating in the Special Political and Decolonization Committee (SPECPOL), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Special Political and Decolonization Committee (SPECPOL) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Special Political and Decolonization Committee (SPECPOL) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Special Political and Decolonization Committee (SPECPOL) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP): While participating in the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for United Nations Development Programme (UNDP): While participating in the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF): While participating in the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for World Trade Organization (WTO): While participating in the World Trade Organization (WTO), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the World Trade Organization (WTO) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the World Trade Organization (WTO) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the World Trade Organization (WTO) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for International Monetary Fund (IMF): While participating in the International Monetary Fund (IMF), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the International Monetary Fund (IMF) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for World Bank Group (WBG): While participating in the World Bank Group (WBG), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the World Bank Group (WBG) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the World Bank Group (WBG) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the World Bank Group (WBG) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for African Union (AU): While participating in the African Union (AU), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the African Union (AU) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the African Union (AU) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the African Union (AU) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for European Union (EU): While participating in the European Union (EU), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the European Union (EU) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the European Union (EU) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the European Union (EU) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Arab League: While participating in the Arab League, delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Arab League is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Arab League reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Arab League must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN): While participating in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO): While participating in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Organization of American States (OAS): While participating in the Organization of American States (OAS), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Organization of American States (OAS) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Organization of American States (OAS) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Organization of American States (OAS) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Crisis Committee - Historic: While participating in the Crisis Committee - Historic, delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Crisis Committee - Historic is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Crisis Committee - Historic reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Crisis Committee - Historic must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Crisis Committee - Futuristic: While participating in the Crisis Committee - Futuristic, delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Crisis Committee - Futuristic is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Crisis Committee - Futuristic reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Crisis Committee - Futuristic must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Ad-Hoc Committee of the Secretary General: While participating in the Ad-Hoc Committee of the Secretary General, delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Ad-Hoc Committee of the Secretary General is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Ad-Hoc Committee of the Secretary General reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Ad-Hoc Committee of the Secretary General must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Joint Crisis Directive: While participating in the Joint Crisis Directive, delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Joint Crisis Directive is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Joint Crisis Directive reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Joint Crisis Directive must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Continuous Crisis Committee: While participating in the Continuous Crisis Committee, delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Continuous Crisis Committee is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Continuous Crisis Committee reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Continuous Crisis Committee must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Press Corps: While participating in the Press Corps, delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Press Corps is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Press Corps reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Press Corps must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs): While participating in the Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union: To the maximum extent permitted by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA): To the maximum extent permitted by the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA).

Legal Disclaimer regarding the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) of the United States: To the maximum extent permitted by the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) of the United States, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) of the United States, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) of the United States.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP) of India: To the maximum extent permitted by the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP) of India, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP) of India, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP) of India.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) of Canada: To the maximum extent permitted by the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) of Canada, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) of Canada, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) of Canada.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the General Data Protection Law (LGPD) of Brazil: To the maximum extent permitted by the General Data Protection Law (LGPD) of Brazil, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the General Data Protection Law (LGPD) of Brazil, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the General Data Protection Law (LGPD) of Brazil.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) of South Africa: To the maximum extent permitted by the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) of South Africa, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) of South Africa, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) of South Africa.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the Privacy Act 1988 of Australia: To the maximum extent permitted by the Privacy Act 1988 of Australia, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the Privacy Act 1988 of Australia, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the Privacy Act 1988 of Australia.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) of Singapore: To the maximum extent permitted by the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) of Singapore, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) of Singapore, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) of Singapore.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) of Japan: To the maximum extent permitted by the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) of Japan, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) of Japan, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) of Japan.

SECTION 3: CODE OF CONDUCT AND DECORUM REVISION 2 Model United Nations relies on the professionalism, diplomacy, and respect of all its participants. At Debate4Change, we hold all delegates, faculty advisors, and observers to the highest standards of international diplomacy. Harassment, discrimination, bullying, or any form of inappropriate behavior will not be tolerated and will result in immediate expulsion from the conference without a refund. All delegates must respect the authority of the Secretariat and the Dias staff.

Rules of Procedure for United Nations General Assembly (UNGA): While participating in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for United Nations Security Council (UNSC): While participating in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC): While participating in the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for World Health Organization (WHO): While participating in the World Health Organization (WHO), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the World Health Organization (WHO) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the World Health Organization (WHO) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the World Health Organization (WHO) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Human Rights Council (UNHRC): While participating in the Human Rights Council (UNHRC), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Human Rights Council (UNHRC) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Human Rights Council (UNHRC) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Human Rights Council (UNHRC) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for International Court of Justice (ICJ): While participating in the International Court of Justice (ICJ), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Disarmament and International Security Committee (DISEC): While participating in the Disarmament and International Security Committee (DISEC), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Disarmament and International Security Committee (DISEC) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Disarmament and International Security Committee (DISEC) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Disarmament and International Security Committee (DISEC) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Social, Humanitarian, and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM): While participating in the Social, Humanitarian, and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Social, Humanitarian, and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Social, Humanitarian, and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Social, Humanitarian, and Cultural Committee (SOCHUM) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Special Political and Decolonization Committee (SPECPOL): While participating in the Special Political and Decolonization Committee (SPECPOL), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Special Political and Decolonization Committee (SPECPOL) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Special Political and Decolonization Committee (SPECPOL) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Special Political and Decolonization Committee (SPECPOL) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP): While participating in the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for United Nations Development Programme (UNDP): While participating in the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF): While participating in the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for World Trade Organization (WTO): While participating in the World Trade Organization (WTO), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the World Trade Organization (WTO) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the World Trade Organization (WTO) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the World Trade Organization (WTO) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for International Monetary Fund (IMF): While participating in the International Monetary Fund (IMF), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the International Monetary Fund (IMF) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for World Bank Group (WBG): While participating in the World Bank Group (WBG), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the World Bank Group (WBG) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the World Bank Group (WBG) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the World Bank Group (WBG) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for African Union (AU): While participating in the African Union (AU), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the African Union (AU) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the African Union (AU) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the African Union (AU) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for European Union (EU): While participating in the European Union (EU), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the European Union (EU) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the European Union (EU) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the European Union (EU) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Arab League: While participating in the Arab League, delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Arab League is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Arab League reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Arab League must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN): While participating in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO): While participating in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Organization of American States (OAS): While participating in the Organization of American States (OAS), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Organization of American States (OAS) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Organization of American States (OAS) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Organization of American States (OAS) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Crisis Committee - Historic: While participating in the Crisis Committee - Historic, delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Crisis Committee - Historic is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Crisis Committee - Historic reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Crisis Committee - Historic must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Crisis Committee - Futuristic: While participating in the Crisis Committee - Futuristic, delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Crisis Committee - Futuristic is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Crisis Committee - Futuristic reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Crisis Committee - Futuristic must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Ad-Hoc Committee of the Secretary General: While participating in the Ad-Hoc Committee of the Secretary General, delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Ad-Hoc Committee of the Secretary General is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Ad-Hoc Committee of the Secretary General reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Ad-Hoc Committee of the Secretary General must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Joint Crisis Directive: While participating in the Joint Crisis Directive, delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Joint Crisis Directive is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Joint Crisis Directive reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Joint Crisis Directive must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Continuous Crisis Committee: While participating in the Continuous Crisis Committee, delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Continuous Crisis Committee is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Continuous Crisis Committee reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Continuous Crisis Committee must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Press Corps: While participating in the Press Corps, delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Press Corps is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Press Corps reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Press Corps must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Rules of Procedure for Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs): While participating in the Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), delegates must adhere strictly to the Debate4Change standard rules of procedure. Plagiarism in position papers submitted to the Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) is considered a severe academic offense. The Dias of the Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) reserves the right to dismiss any delegate found violating the dress code, using inappropriate language, or disrupting the flow of debate. Any resolutions drafted in the Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) must represent original work and proper diplomatic engagement.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union: To the maximum extent permitted by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of the European Union.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA): To the maximum extent permitted by the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA).

Legal Disclaimer regarding the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) of the United States: To the maximum extent permitted by the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) of the United States, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) of the United States, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) of the United States.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP) of India: To the maximum extent permitted by the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP) of India, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP) of India, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP) of India.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) of Canada: To the maximum extent permitted by the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) of Canada, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) of Canada, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) of Canada.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the General Data Protection Law (LGPD) of Brazil: To the maximum extent permitted by the General Data Protection Law (LGPD) of Brazil, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the General Data Protection Law (LGPD) of Brazil, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the General Data Protection Law (LGPD) of Brazil.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) of South Africa: To the maximum extent permitted by the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) of South Africa, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) of South Africa, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the Protection of Personal Information Act (POPIA) of South Africa.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the Privacy Act 1988 of Australia: To the maximum extent permitted by the Privacy Act 1988 of Australia, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the Privacy Act 1988 of Australia, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the Privacy Act 1988 of Australia.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) of Singapore: To the maximum extent permitted by the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) of Singapore, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) of Singapore, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) of Singapore.

Legal Disclaimer regarding the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) of Japan: To the maximum extent permitted by the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) of Japan, Debate4Change disclaims all warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, reliability, or availability of our services. In jurisdictions governed by the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) of Japan, our liability for any direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages arising out of your participation in the conference is strictly limited to the amount paid for registration fees. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless Debate4Change and its affiliates from any claims arising under the Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) of Japan.